Homepage
Music (down)
Design
| Friday, April 11, 2008 |
| Police and Shepherds |
People on both sides have decried the United States' role as the "world police" - endlessly stomping out trouble in other people's back yards for fear it will spread into ours. Such difficulties are to be expected in the new, connected world, but the financial burden as well as the lives lost are difficult to justify. The Republicans, in their recent stint in office, have taken the "world police" notion to a whole new level of ridiculousness: the preemptive war. This sort of thing was once a funny joke in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
"The phases [of the history of warfare] are retribution, anticipation, and diplomacy. Thus, retribution: "I'm going to kill you because you killed my brother." Anticipation: "I'm going to kill you because I killed your brother." And diplomacy: "I'm going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that your brother did it."
It takes a conspiracy theorist to believe we are at the "diplomacy" level, although there are plenty of them, and they probably could make convincing arguments that we have killed people in our "brother" nations and that we've framed others for it, or otherwise mixed up the politics enough to make the situation similar. Remember: we gave Iraq, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan most of their guns. Same goes for the warring factions in Somalia, too. It's pretty clear that this method of giving lots of guns to people who hate each other, and then going in and fighting with everyone in the name of security isn't working.
I am a political Independent, because above all, I'm a pragmatist. With apologies to SNL, bitches don't get things done. Hard-thinking, level-headed, smart people get things done. And the only way to get meaningful change like universal health care, an end to abortion, worldwide green power, and especially relative world peace is to make it profitable and in every single person's best interest to make sure it happens. The very powerful have to be given a reason to care, and the weak have to be given a way and the hope to act.
So how can the powerful be given reason to care about world peace, given the military-industrial complex, and how can the weak be given hope and means when they are at its mercy?
This, above all, is the role of government. The government is able to change the rules for normal people. For example, right now you get a tax break for donating a lot of money to charities. It's also in the best interest of rich owners to treat their workers well, because of laws and unions. That wouldn't exist without government. The execution of this responsibility has made great strides in the U.S. and elsewhere, although the U.S. took several leaps backwards in the last 20-30 years or so.
But it's time for it to get back on the horse. Because the world is more connected, turning a blind eye to corporate greed abroad is as harmful in the long run to us as arming the Middle East to the teeth, because irresponsible greed breeds hate. On the other hand, we already have rules that encourage green technology, programs like the Peace Corps, and other worldwide charity - and we need more of those rules.
The ways and means have been defined well, and they've been shown to work. We just need to see them implemented.Labels: economics, environment, global, government, peace, people, politics, war, work |
posted by Steve @ 10:18 AM  |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, October 04, 2005 |
| Political Rant no. 3: Letter to Senator McCain |
Senator McCain -
I want to say first that, cynical as I've become, you've always surprised me with your candid, sensible approach to governing. I understand your decisions - even when I dont agree with them. You have a supporter if youd like to become President.
I have three things I'd like to point out to you: taxes, energy, and Jon Stewart.
I believe IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson has done well and deserves the money to continue properly taxing. In particular, I would love to see the evasion of taxes involving mutual funds, off-shore accounts, etc, come to an end. People like me, who can't afford anything we havent fought bitterly for, feel cheated when shown things like this:
"On March 30, 2004, Congress was told that 78 percent of known tax cheats in investment partnerships are not even asked to pay because there are not enough tax collectors to go after them. While letting rich tax cheats run wild, Congress did finance a crackdown on the poor. The working poor, most of whom make less than $16,000, are eight times more likely to be audited than millionaire investors in partnerships." (source)
Let him do his job well, and the deficit will be cleared just that much faster.
Energy. I have never been so sad and yet grinned so wide when I read your statements (1, 2)about the Energy Bill. In all seriousness - THANK YOU for recognizing it for what it is. More importantly, thank you for recognizing that what weve done so far is inadequate, in particular with fuels and ethanol (gasohol). Most of the current solutions involve one of two things: New forms of transportation (electric, hybrids) or radically modifying our current cars (bio-diesel). I applaud your work with Senator Lieberman on encouraging new technologies. However, while new technologies should be employed in new vehicles, consider the ratio of new vehicles to old. It will be a long time before the new-technology vehicles are enough in number compared to old-technology for them to do significant good.
What we need is something that will run relatively clean on current and older cars. Weve spent $200 Billion on Iraq why dont we give $20 Billion to scientists from DuPont, Harvard, and the military and say make a substance that burns at a spark smoothly at 92 octane, does not freeze above -20 degrees F, nor evaporate below 140, and runs my 62 VW as well as a new Corvette, at a total cost of less than $1 per gallon to the consumer. I just refuse to believe that its impossible.
Energy independence is something that is well worth the cost of research. Imagine if tomorrow, we sent a diplomat to all of the nations in the squabbling Middle East and say, "we dont need your oil and were selling our new substitute to Europe for a buck a gallon." Instant reform. They would have to their whole economies are based on oil. Thats how they can have ridiculous poverty and no women working.
I understand that this is armchair politics, easy from where I am sitting and much more difficult to actually do. Please, help take the momentum of the unanimous public assertion that the Energy bill was terrible and help propose putting money where America can use it best - a product we can sell to improve our economy that also severs our umbilical cord to the Middle East.
Finally, look for the clip from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in which your conversation with General Richard Myers. You received resounding applause.
[signed]
 | Currently listening : Rattle and Hum By U2 |
Labels: environment, gas, government, irs, money, oil, politics, rant |
posted by Steve @ 4:04 PM  |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, September 28, 2005 |
| Random Thought no. 7: Electric Cars |
Electric cars are, in general, a good idea. They don't work so great, yet, but I dig the idea of running a car for a lot less money than I do now. One day we might not have to buy $65,000 worth of car to save $500 a year in gas...
But anyway. That's not really what I'm worried about, because the whole thing about cost will sort itself out eventually (I hope).
I'm worried about noise. One of the really unsettling things about seeing an electric car is when you turn it on - there's no noise. There is literally no discernible difference between when it's about to take off or it's just sitting there. This kinda freaks me out. Cars are dangerous enough when they make a ton of noise, but now we'll have stealthy 2-ton pedestrian flatteners on the loose. On the other hand, it really would be pretty ridiculous to have artificial sound-makers, wouldn't it?
So I don't know what to think about this. Flashing lights? No, that's for emergency vehicles. Sure, they have to happen for the environment's sake (and for costs' sake) but ... I remain freaked out.
PS - the new Fiona Apple and Sigur Ros albums are really good.
 | Currently listening : Takk... By Sigur Rós |
Labels: cars, environment, kids, random, rant |
posted by Steve @ 1:27 AM  |
|
|
|
|
| About Me |
|

Name: Steve
Home: Tucson, Arizona, United States
About Me: I like to think about things, and I occasionally like to write what I think.
See my complete profile
|
| Previous Post |
|
| Archives |
|
|
| Links |
|
Blogroll
|
|